No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{ROOTPAGENAME}} | {{ROOTPAGENAME}} | ||
== Principles == | == Principles == | ||
{{DocumentSections2| | {{DocumentSections2|Principle|{{SUBPAGENAME}}|{{ROOTPAGENAME}} }} | ||
[[Category:Document]] | [[Category:Document]] |
Revision as of 18:51, 19 October 2022
Open access to scholarly publications, Policy component for open access to journal and conference articles, Open education and educational resources, open access to scholarly publications. National policy and executive plan by the higher education and research community for 2021–2025: Policy component for open access to theses
Julkaisut
Principles
Principle 1: Cost management
The total cost for scholarly publications will not exceed the current overall cost when transitioning to open access. The estimate of overall costs reflects all present costs and the total volume of research.
Ensuring the realisation and monitoring of the principle:
- Review of the initial situation: During 2020 the Finnish National Library will conduct an assessment in cooperation with the research organisations to estimate the overall cost of open access to scholarly publications for the research organisations. Additionally, the Finnish National Library will estimate the cost of open access for Finnish scientific publishers. The review will account for the costs of open access that have already been incurred.
- Continuous monitoring: The Finnish National Library will annually monitor the overall costs of access to scholarly publications and changes in the cost structure in cooperation with the research organisations.
Principle 2: Equal opportunity to publish
All researchers have an equal opportunity to publish their research through open access, regardless of field of research, funding basis, or career stage.
Ensuring the realisation and monitoring of the principle:
- Review of the initial situation: During 2020, the Open Science Coordination will review the specific challenges related to equal opportunities.
- Continuous monitoring: The Open Science Coordination will monitor developments in equal opportunities in cooperation with the research organisations, and will initiate dialogue on ways to increase equal opportunities.
Principle 3: Independent assessment
When assessing scholarly publications, the quality and openness of individual research publications are considered independently.
Ensuring the realisation and monitoring of the principle:
- Review of the initial situation: During 2020, there will be a review on how open access to publications is currently taken into account in the systems for assessing researchers at higher education institutions and other research organisations.
-
Continuous monitoring: Coordination of a regular review of how open access to publications is taken into account in the systems for evaluating researchers at higher education institutions and research organisations.
- a) The Publication Forum will monitor the open access publication channels and impact of open access on the average level of quality of the publication channels.
- b) The Responsible Evaluation of Researchers recommendation defines in more detail the importance of open of research practices in researcher assessment.Publications-footnote-1
Principle 4: Dynamic assessment
The assessment of researchers and research takes into account new and changing forms of publishing reflecting open science.
Ensuring the realisation and monitoring of the principle:
- Review of the initial situation: During 2020, a review will be conducted of how new forms of open scholarly publishing are taken into account in the systems for evaluating researchers and research at higher education institutions and other research organisations.
-
Continuous monitoring: There will be regular reviews of how new forms of open scholarly publishing are taken into account in the systems for evaluating researchers and research at higher education institutions and research organisations.
- a) Research organisations and research funders commit to taking open access into account in their evaluations. The Responsible Evaluation of Researchers recommendation defines research outputs, including data and research methods, open access and evaluation in more detail. More details on open access to research material are outlined in a separate policy.
References
- ^ Finnish research organisation refers to higher education institutions and public research institutes registered in Finland.
- ^ Finnish research funder refers to any actor registered in Finland that funds scientific research.
- ^ The role of corresponding author should be agreed on in accordance with the recommendation of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (TENK) entitled Agreeing on authorship – Recommendation for research publications. However, researchers working in or affiliated with Finnish research organisations who participate in joint international projects are encouraged to actively aim for the role of corresponding author, thus promoting the achievement of the objectives of open science.
- ^ With respect to the information concerning open access, which is included in the information on publications collected by the Ministry of Education and Culture, it should be noted that it covers all publications where one or more of the authors are researchers working in organisations covered by the reporting.
- ^ Pre-prints, i.e. non peer-reviewed draft publications, that are saved in a publicly accessible databasedo not fulfil the criteria of open access. Publications kept in international open access repositories fulfil the criteria of open access after they have been peer reviewed.